Administrators, Editors, Bots, Bureaucrats, Charaksamhita, Moderators (CommentStreams), Interface administrators, Administrators
10,235
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 303:
Line 303: − + + + + +
→34. Pratutsara (Rebuttal)
===34. Pratutsara (Rebuttal)===
===34. Pratutsara (Rebuttal)===
In a scientific discussion, opinions of each other are refuted, with scientific reasoning. E.g. in Ch.Su.25, the opinion of Parikshi Maudgalya, that Purusha (living being or human being) is made up of Atma (soul), is further refuted by Sharaloma, who proposed that Purusha is produced from mana(mind). Further his opinion is also refuted. This type of methodology is called as pratyutsara.
In a scientific discussion, opinions of each other are refuted, with scientific reasoning. E.g. in the conference of discussion on origin of ''Purusha'', Parikshi Maudgalya opined that ''Purusha'' (living being or human being) is originated from ''Atma'' (soul).This is further refuted by Sharaloma, who proposed that ''Purusha'' is produced from ''mana''(mind). Further his opinion is also refuted[[Yajjah Purushiya Adhyaya # The opinion of Maudgalya Parikshi on Atmaja Purusha (spirit theory)|(Cha.Su.25/8-25)]]. This type of methodology is called as pratyutsara.
In clinical discussions, the opinions of various specialist are taken and considered for differential diagnosis. Then each one of them is refuted and final diagnosis is made.
In research, the peer review method is followed to improve the scientific validity of content. The views of other scientists can be refuted with support.
===35. Uddhara(Re-affirmation)===
===35. Uddhara(Re-affirmation)===